Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 33(3): 446-457, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325589

RESUMO

To synthesize the available evidence regarding lip repositioning surgery (LRS) and quantify the short- and long-term reduction in excessive gingival display (EGD) with the procedure. Additionally, evaluate the effect of myotomy on the results. Seven electronic databases were searched up to May 2020 by two independent reviewers. Studies evaluating the exclusive use of LRS to treat EGD were included. After risk of bias assessment, the data were quantitatively evaluated with random-effects meta-analysis. The initial database search yielded 368 studies, of which 16 were selected for full-text review. Finally, eight studies were included. The random effects model exhibited an EGD reduction of 2.87 mm (95% CI: 1.91-3.82) after 3 months of LRS. These results decreased after 6 months (2.71 mm; 95% CI: 1.95-3.47) and 12 months (2.10 mm; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72). Meta-analysis comparing the performance of myotomy showed greater EGD reduction at 6 months than without myotomy (P < 0.02). LRS is an effective approach for treating EGD, and it has satisfactory results up to 6 months. After this period, the effectiveness appears to progressively decrease over time indicating substantial relapse at 12 months. Myotomy seems a suitable alternative to increase the stability of LRS. Lip repositioning surgery is an effective procedure to improve smile esthetics in the short-term (up to 6 months). After this period, the efficacy of LRS seems to decrease progressively, and an approximately 25% relapse may be expected after 12 months. Clinicians should combine the procedure with other approaches, such as plastic periodontal surgeries, restorative procedures, or botulin toxin injections for more predictable and stable outcomes.


Assuntos
Gengivectomia , Lábio , Estética Dentária , Gengiva , Sorriso
2.
Braz Dent J ; 26(6): 602-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963203

RESUMO

Mucograft(r) is a resorbing porcine matrix composed of type I and type III collagen, used for soft tissue augmentation in guided tissue bony regeneration procedures. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of Mucograft(r) in human gingival fibroblasts, as well as the ability of the matrix to induce production of extracellular matrix. Six resorbing Mucograft(r) matrices (MCG) were cut into 3 x 2 mm rectangles and 5 x 5 mm squares and were placed in 96- and 24-well plates, respectively. The control group (CTRL) consisted of cells plated on polystyrene without the MCG. After one, two, three and seven days, cell proliferation and viability were assessed using the Trypan exclusion method and MTT test, respectively. Type III collagen (COL 3A1) and vimentin (VIM) expression were also evaluated at 10 and 14 days, using Western blotting. Statistical analysis, using ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test, revealed that human gingival fibroblasts from MCG showed similar results (p>0.05) for proliferation and viability as the cells cultured on CTRL. After 14 days, a significant decrease in COL 3A1 expression (p<0.05) was observed when cultured with the MCG. VIM expression showed no significant difference at any time period (p>0.05). Although no increase in extracellular matrix secretion was observed in this in vitro study, Mucograft(r) presented cellular compatibility, being an option for a scaffold whenever it is required.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis , Colágeno Tipo III , Colágeno Tipo I , Gengiva/citologia , Proliferação de Células , Fibroblastos/citologia , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...